Winner and loser headcounts are widely used to evaluate the distributional effects of public policies, but their policy ranking can change when the statistical unit switches from households to individuals. We introduce the compensation gap: the average monetary shortfall that must be filled to keep losses below a chosen threshold. For any policy, population subgroup, and common loss threshold, reporting this shortfall per household or per person changes its scale but not the policy ranking. The measure combines the incidence and intensity of losses and has a direct interpretation as a residual compensation budget. We illustrate the measure using a Belgian carbon-pricing microsimulation. Headcounts rank equal per-household and equal per-capita dividends differently depending on the statistical unit. The compensation gap yields a unique ranking: eliminating the remaining losses requires €6.03 per household per month under the per-household dividend and €6.48 under the per-capita dividend.
Field :